SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to ScrapingAnt

Other Browser automation and web data vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that ScrapingAnt does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 24 that differ from ScrapingAnt on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

ScrapingAnt has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and ScrapingAnt does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and ScrapingAnt does notScrapingAnt publishes, and they do not
Microlinkmicrolink.io 65/100 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 1 Data location stated Compare
Zytezyte.com 39/100 5 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Browser Usebrowser-use.com 52/100 4 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 1 Data location stated Compare
Firecrawlfirecrawl.dev 39/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Apifyapify.com 30/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Oxylabsoxylabs.io 26/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Urlboxurlbox.com 26/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Scrapflyscrapfly.io 38/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Scrapingdogscrapingdog.com 38/100 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Browserlessbrowserless.io 35/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
ZenRowszenrows.com 35/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Axiomaxiom.ai 24/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.