SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to ScrapingAnt

Other Browser automation and web data vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at ScrapingAnt. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from ScrapingAnt on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

ScrapingAnt has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at ScrapingAnt” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at ScrapingAntFound at ScrapingAnt, not found there
Browser Usebrowser-use.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Browser Use 52/100 5 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 1 Data location stated Compare
Microlinkmicrolink.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Microlink 57/100 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 Data location stated Compare
Scrapingdogscrapingdog.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scrapingdog 52/100 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 2 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Scrapflyscrapfly.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Scrapfly 43/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Firecrawlfirecrawl.devSee also Transparency alternatives to Firecrawl 39/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Zytezyte.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zyte 30/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Urlboxurlbox.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Urlbox 26/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Browserlessbrowserless.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Browserless 35/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Hyperbrowserhyperbrowser.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Hyperbrowser 35/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
ZenRowszenrows.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ZenRows 35/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Axiomaxiom.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Axiom 24/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Anchor Browseranchorbrowser.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Anchor Browser 22/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.