SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Steel

Other Browser automation and web data vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Steel does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 23 that differ from Steel on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Steel has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Steel does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Steel does notSteel publishes, and they do not
Microlinkmicrolink.io 65/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 nothing Compare
Browser Usebrowser-use.com 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 nothing Compare
Firecrawlfirecrawl.dev 39/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Zytezyte.com 39/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent nothing Compare
ScrapingAntscrapingant.com 35/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Scrapflyscrapfly.io 38/100 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named nothing Compare
Scrapingdogscrapingdog.com 38/100 2 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure nothing Compare
Browserlessbrowserless.io 35/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named nothing Compare
ScrapingBeescrapingbee.com 35/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
ZenRowszenrows.com 35/100 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Apifyapify.com 30/100 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Oxylabsoxylabs.io 26/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.