Transparency alternatives to Shadow Planner
Other Business continuity vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Shadow Planner. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 15 that differ from Shadow Planner on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Shadow Planner has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Shadow Planner” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Shadow Planner | Found at Shadow Planner, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fusion Risk Managementfusionrm.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fusion Risk Management | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Cutovercutover.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cutover | 17/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Origami Riskorigamirisk.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Origami Risk | 17/100 | 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Preparispreparis.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Preparis | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Databarracksdatabarracks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Databarracks | 17/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Rockdoverockdovesolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rockdove | 16/100 | 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | nothing | Compare |
| Protechtprotechtgroup.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Protecht | 14/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Ncontractsncontracts.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ncontracts | 13/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Cammscammsgroup.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Camms | 13/100 | 1 Data location stated | nothing | Compare |
| Crises Controlcrises-control.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Crises Control | 11/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Continuity2continuity2.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Continuity2 | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Crisis24crisis24.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Crisis24 | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.