SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Endpoint Clinical

Other Clinical trial software vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Endpoint Clinical. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 38 that differ from Endpoint Clinical on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Endpoint Clinical has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Endpoint Clinical” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at Endpoint ClinicalFound at Endpoint Clinical, not found there
Florenceflorencehc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Florence 39/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
4G Clinical4gclinical.comSee also Transparency alternatives to 4G Clinical 30/100 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data location stated Compare
Cluepointscluepoints.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cluepoints 22/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
OpenClinicaopenclinica.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OpenClinica 30/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named nothing Compare
TrialKitcrucialdatasolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TrialKit 30/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Viedocviedoc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Viedoc 22/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data location stated Compare
Almac Clinicalalmacgroup.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Almac Clinical 17/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Montriummontrium.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Montrium 13/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Trialdatatrialdata.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Trialdata 13/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Suvodasuvoda.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Suvoda 30/100 1 Subprocessor list nothing Compare
Advarraadvarra.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Advarra 26/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Antidoteantidote.meSee also Transparency alternatives to Antidote 26/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.