Alternatives to Endpoint Clinical

Other Clinical trial software vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Endpoint Clinical does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from Endpoint Clinical on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Endpoint Clinical has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Endpoint Clinical does not” is the one that closes them.