SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Upsun

Other Cloud hosting vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Upsun does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 26 that differ from Upsun on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Upsun has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “publishes and Upsun does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Upsun does notUpsun publishes, and they do not
Exoscaleexoscale.com 87/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 nothing Compare
DigitalOceandigitalocean.com 75/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Kinstakinsta.com 70/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 1 Certifications named Compare
Renderrender.com 70/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history nothing Compare
Cloudflarecloudflare.com 65/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history 1 Certifications named Compare
Vercelvercel.com 65/100 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure nothing Compare
Aptibleaptible.com 55/100 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Fly.iofly.io 55/100 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Hetznerhetzner.com 50/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent 2 Public pricing, Certifications named Compare
Cloudwayscloudways.com 33/100 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Netlifynetlify.com 57/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Railwayrailway.com 52/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.