Transparency alternatives to Refact
Other Coding assistants vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Refact. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 15 that differ from Refact on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Refact has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Refact” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Refact | Found at Refact, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factoryfactory.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Factory | 74/100 | 8 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +5 | nothing | Compare |
| Poolsidepoolside.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Poolside | 52/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Augment Codeaugmentcode.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Augment Code | 48/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Cursorcursor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cursor | 48/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Kilokilo.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Kilo | 48/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Zedzed.devSee also Transparency alternatives to Zed | 48/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Cognitioncognition.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cognition | 43/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Magicmagic.devSee also Transparency alternatives to Magic | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Qodoqodo.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Qodo | 35/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Roomoteroomote.devSee also Transparency alternatives to Roomote | 35/100 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Unblockedgetunblocked.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Unblocked | 30/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | nothing | Compare |
| OpenHandsopenhands.devSee also Transparency alternatives to OpenHands | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.