Alternatives to Archer
Other Compliance automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Archer does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 27 that differ from Archer on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Archer has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Archer does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Archer does not | Archer publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bitsightbitsight.com | 70/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Vantavanta.com | 70/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| LogicGatelogicgate.com | 55/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 | 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| UpGuardupguard.com | 52/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Akitraakitra.com | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Certacerta.ai | 43/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Trustcloudtrustcloud.ai | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Hyperproofhyperproof.io | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Conveyorconveyor.com | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Apptegaapptega.com | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Optrooptro.ai | 30/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Panorayspanorays.com | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.