Transparency alternatives to LogicGate
Other Compliance automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at LogicGate. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 59 that differ from LogicGate on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
LogicGate has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “Found there, not found at LogicGate” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at LogicGate | Found at LogicGate, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Secureframesecureframe.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Secureframe | 83/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | nothing | Compare |
| Keelkeelgrc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Keel | 78/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | nothing | Compare |
| Vantavanta.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vanta | 57/100 | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Whisticwhistic.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Whistic | 57/100 | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Hyperproofhyperproof.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Hyperproof | 48/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| ProcessUnityprocessunity.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ProcessUnity | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Trusterotrustero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Trustero | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Conveyorconveyor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Conveyor | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Riskonnectriskonnect.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Riskonnect | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Unified Complianceunifiedcompliance.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Unified Compliance | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Cypagocypago.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cypago | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Certacerta.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Certa | 43/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.