SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Riskonnect

Other Compliance automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Riskonnect does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 27 that differ from Riskonnect on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Riskonnect has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Riskonnect does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Riskonnect does notRiskonnect publishes, and they do not
Vantavanta.com 70/100 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 nothing Compare
Bitsightbitsight.com 70/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 nothing Compare
LogicGatelogicgate.com 55/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 1 Data location stated Compare
UpGuardupguard.com 52/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 nothing Compare
Optrooptro.ai 30/100 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Cypagocypago.com 26/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Hyperproofhyperproof.io 48/100 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing nothing Compare
Akitraakitra.com 43/100 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Certacerta.ai 43/100 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Conveyorconveyor.com 43/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing nothing Compare
Trustcloudtrustcloud.ai 39/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Kertoskertos.io 30/100 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.