Alternatives to Kertos
Other Compliance automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Kertos does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 27 that differ from Kertos on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Kertos has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Kertos does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Kertos does not | Kertos publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vantavanta.com | 70/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| UpGuardupguard.com | 52/100 | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Bitsightbitsight.com | 70/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Akitraakitra.com | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Conveyorconveyor.com | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Trustcloudtrustcloud.ai | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Cypagocypago.com | 26/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| LogicGatelogicgate.com | 55/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Hyperproofhyperproof.io | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Certacerta.ai | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Apptegaapptega.com | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Optrooptro.ai | 30/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.