Transparency alternatives to Sanity
Other Content management systems vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Sanity. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 40 that differ from Sanity on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Sanity has 2 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “Found there, not found at Sanity” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Sanity | Found at Sanity, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Storyblokstoryblok.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Storyblok | 74/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Contentstackcontentstack.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Contentstack | 57/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 5 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| Pantheonpantheon.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Pantheon | 52/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Craft CMScraftcms.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Craft CMS | 48/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 | Compare |
| Cockpitgetcockpit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cockpit | 22/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 9 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +6 | Compare |
| Directusdirectus.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Directus | 52/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Uniformuniform.devSee also Transparency alternatives to Uniform | 43/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Shorthandshorthand.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Shorthand | 39/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Strapistrapi.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Strapi | 39/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| CloudCannoncloudcannon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CloudCannon | 35/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Hygraphhygraph.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hygraph | 35/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 | Compare |
| Prismicprismic.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Prismic | 35/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.