SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to CloudCannon

Other Content management systems vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at CloudCannon. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 40 that differ from CloudCannon on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

CloudCannon has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at CloudCannon” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at CloudCannonFound at CloudCannon, not found there
Sanitysanity.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Sanity 78/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 nothing Compare
Storyblokstoryblok.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Storyblok 74/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 nothing Compare
Contentstackcontentstack.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Contentstack 57/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Pantheonpantheon.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Pantheon 52/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Directusdirectus.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Directus 52/100 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Craft CMScraftcms.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Craft CMS 48/100 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Uniformuniform.devSee also Transparency alternatives to Uniform 43/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Certifications named Compare
Shorthandshorthand.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Shorthand 39/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 1 Public pricing Compare
Ibexaibexa.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Ibexa 30/100 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Public pricing, Certifications named Compare
Joomlajoomla.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Joomla 30/100 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Public pricing, Certifications named Compare
TYPO3typo3.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TYPO3 30/100 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Public pricing, Certifications named Compare
Kontent.aikontent.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Kontent.ai 26/100 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Public pricing, Certifications named Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.