SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Craft CMS

Other Content management systems vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Craft CMS. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 40 that differ from Craft CMS on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Craft CMS has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Craft CMS” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at Craft CMSFound at Craft CMS, not found there
Sanitysanity.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Sanity 78/100 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 1 Subprocessor list Compare
Storyblokstoryblok.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Storyblok 74/100 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Directusdirectus.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Directus 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Pantheonpantheon.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Pantheon 52/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Contentstackcontentstack.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Contentstack 57/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Uniformuniform.devSee also Transparency alternatives to Uniform 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Shorthandshorthand.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Shorthand 39/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
CloudCannoncloudcannon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CloudCannon 35/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Strapistrapi.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Strapi 39/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 2 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
ButterCMSbuttercms.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ButterCMS 30/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Progress Sitefinityprogress.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Progress Sitefinity 30/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Kontent.aikontent.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Kontent.ai 26/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.