SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Pantheon

Other Content management systems vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Pantheon does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 32 that differ from Pantheon on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Pantheon has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Pantheon does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Pantheon does notPantheon publishes, and they do not
Sanitysanity.io 78/100 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 1 Subprocessor list Compare
Storyblokstoryblok.com 74/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Status page with history Compare
Uniformuniform.dev 57/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
Directusdirectus.io 52/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Craft CMScraftcms.com 48/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare
Tinatina.io 39/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare
Umbracoumbraco.com 26/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 Compare
Strapistrapi.io 39/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Hygraphhygraph.com 35/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Prismicprismic.io 35/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare
ButterCMSbuttercms.com 30/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare
Ibexaibexa.co 30/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.