Transparency alternatives to Yellow.ai
Other Conversational AI vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Yellow.ai. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 41 that differ from Yellow.ai on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Yellow.ai has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “Found there, not found at Yellow.ai” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Yellow.ai | Found at Yellow.ai, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MessageBirdbird.comSee also Transparency alternatives to MessageBird | 87/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Netominetomi.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Netomi | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Sendbirdsendbird.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sendbird | 65/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | 2 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Forethoughtforethought.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Forethought | 61/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Chatfuelchatfuel.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Chatfuel | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Moveworksmoveworks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Moveworks | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Kore.aikore.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Kore.ai | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Botpressbotpress.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Botpress | 57/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Sinchsinch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sinch | 57/100 | 1 Status page with history | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Rasarasa.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rasa | 48/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Tiledesktiledesk.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tiledesk | 48/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Wotnotwotnot.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Wotnot | 48/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.