SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Tiledesk

Other Conversational AI vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Tiledesk. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 40 that differ from Tiledesk on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Tiledesk has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Tiledesk” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at TiledeskFound at Tiledesk, not found there
MessageBirdbird.comSee also Transparency alternatives to MessageBird 87/100 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
Sendbirdsendbird.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sendbird 52/100 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated Compare
Botpressbotpress.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Botpress 57/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Sinchsinch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sinch 57/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named 1 Data location stated Compare
Yellow.aiyellow.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Yellow.ai 55/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure 1 Data location stated Compare
Netominetomi.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Netomi 48/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Infobipinfobip.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Infobip 43/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact Compare
Witivio AI Desk Prowitivio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Witivio AI Desk Pro 30/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare
Forethoughtforethought.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Forethought 61/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named nothing Compare
Wotnotwotnot.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Wotnot 48/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Parloaparloa.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Parloa 39/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Typewisetypewise.appSee also Transparency alternatives to Typewise 39/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.