SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Moveworks

Other Conversational AI vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Moveworks. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 41 that differ from Moveworks on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Moveworks has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Moveworks” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at MoveworksFound at Moveworks, not found there
MessageBirdbird.comSee also Transparency alternatives to MessageBird 87/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +3 nothing Compare
Botpressbotpress.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Botpress 57/100 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Yellow.aiyellow.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Yellow.ai 55/100 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 2 Data location stated, Status page with history Compare
Sendbirdsendbird.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sendbird 52/100 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 2 Data location stated, Status page with history Compare
Sinchsinch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sinch 57/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 1 Data location stated Compare
Forethoughtforethought.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Forethought 61/100 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Rasarasa.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rasa 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
Tiledesktiledesk.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tiledesk 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
Wotnotwotnot.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Wotnot 48/100 3 Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Infobipinfobip.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Infobip 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
Kommunicatekommunicate.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Kommunicate 26/100 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
Netominetomi.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Netomi 48/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.