Certifications named in Monitoring and observability
Naming SOC 2 or ISO 27001 publicly is the low bar; not naming them is a signal.
- 18Published
- 29Vendors measured
- 62%Of those measured
- 2026-08-31Checked
62% here against 48% across every category we measure. Monitoring and observability sits above the overall share for this criterion.
Back to Certifications named across all categories, or to Monitoring and observability.
Published
SOC 2 or ISO 27001 named on a public page.
No named certification found.
We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.
| Vendor | What we found |
|---|---|
| Bugsnag | 6 addresses checked |
| Cronitor | 6 addresses checked |
| Highlight | 6 addresses checked |
| Last9 | 6 addresses checked |
| Netdata | 6 addresses checked |
| New Relic | 6 addresses checked |
| Raygun | 6 addresses checked |
| Sematext | 6 addresses checked |
| SigNoz | 6 addresses checked |
| StatusCake | 6 addresses checked |
| Zabbix | 6 addresses checked |
Not measured
We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.
| Vendor | What we found |
|---|---|
| Graylog | The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured. |
Found something we missed? Tell us and the next run picks it up.