SaaS Ranking

Data processing agreement in Low-code and internal tools

Without a published DPA you cannot review the contract before you talk to sales.

5 of 47 companies we measured here publish it, that is 11%. Last checked 2026-10-17.

11% here against 11% across every category we measure. Low-code and internal tools sits exactly at the overall share for this criterion.

This page counts companies, not product entries: a company with two products in this category is one company here and two rows below.

Back to Data processing agreement across all categories, or to Low-code and internal tools.

The evidence at a glance
  • Found5
  • Not found at checked addresses42
  • Not measured1

48 companies in total. Unmeasured companies are excluded from the published share.

Published

Published and readable without a login.

VendorWhat we found
Backendless https://backendless.com/data-processing-agreement/Checked
Caspio https://www.caspio.com/legal/dpa/Checked
DronaHQ https://www.dronahq.com/dpa/Checked
Jet Admin https://www.jetadmin.io/dpaChecked
Kohezion https://www.kohezion.com/blog/gdpr-compliance-softwareChecked
No data processing agreement found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
Agilebase 8 addresses checkedChecked
Appian 8 addresses checkedChecked
Apply Digital Systems 8 addresses checkedChecked
Appsmith 8 addresses checkedChecked
Basedash 8 addresses checkedChecked
Baserow 8 addresses checkedChecked
Betty Blocks 8 addresses checkedChecked
Budibase 8 addresses checkedChecked
Claris FileMaker Cloud 8 addresses checkedChecked
Codeless Platform 8 addresses checkedChecked
Cogniss 8 addresses checkedChecked
CORE Software 8 addresses checkedChecked
Draxlr 8 addresses checkedChecked
Equals 8 addresses checkedChecked
Forest Admin 8 addresses checkedChecked
GoodBarber 8 addresses checkedChecked
Grist 8 addresses checkedChecked
Jetboost 8 addresses checkedChecked
K-Rise EASYProcess 8 addresses checkedChecked
Marmelab 8 addresses checkedChecked
Mendix 8 addresses checkedChecked
Ninox 8 addresses checkedChecked
NocoDB 8 addresses checkedChecked
Noloco 8 addresses checkedChecked
OrangeKloud 8 addresses checkedChecked
OutSystems 8 addresses checkedChecked
Pega 8 addresses checkedChecked
Pory 8 addresses checkedChecked
Quickbase 8 addresses checkedChecked
Refine 8 addresses checkedChecked
Retool 8 addresses checkedChecked
Rows 8 addresses checkedChecked
RUAL Core 8 addresses checkedChecked
Stacker 8 addresses checkedChecked
Superblocks 8 addresses checkedChecked
Teable 8 addresses checkedChecked
TeamDesk 8 addresses checkedChecked
ToolJet 8 addresses checkedChecked
UI Bakery 8 addresses checkedChecked
Windmill 8 addresses checkedChecked
Xano 8 addresses checkedChecked
Zingy 8 addresses checkedChecked
Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

VendorWhat we found
Unqork This vendor was not measured because our run stopped waiting for it.Checked

Other criteria in Low-code and internal tools

Data processing agreement in related categories

Found something we missed? Tell us. A correction moves that vendor into our next nightly run. That run reads the same fixed addresses we check for every vendor, not the address you send.