SaaS Ranking

Subprocessor list in Low-code and internal tools

Naming the actual subprocessors is what turns a privacy promise into something you can check.

4 of 47 companies we measured here publish it, that is 9%. Last checked 2026-10-17.

9% here against 7% across every category we measure. Low-code and internal tools sits above the overall share for this criterion.

This page counts companies, not product entries: a company with two products in this category is one company here and two rows below.

Back to Subprocessor list across all categories, or to Low-code and internal tools.

The evidence at a glance
  • Found4
  • Not found at checked addresses43
  • Not measured1

48 companies in total. Unmeasured companies are excluded from the published share.

Published

The actual list is published, not just a promise to keep one.

VendorWhat we found
Forest Admin https://forest.app/legal/sub-processorsChecked
Pega https://www.pega.com/subprocessorsChecked
Retool https://docs.retool.com/legal/subprocessorsChecked
Superblocks https://www.superblocks.com/legal/subprocessorsChecked
No subprocessor list found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
Agilebase 7 addresses checkedChecked
Appian 7 addresses checkedChecked
Apply Digital Systems 7 addresses checkedChecked
Appsmith 7 addresses checkedChecked
Backendless 7 addresses checkedChecked
Basedash 7 addresses checkedChecked
Baserow 7 addresses checkedChecked
Betty Blocks 7 addresses checkedChecked
Budibase 7 addresses checkedChecked
Caspio 7 addresses checkedChecked
Claris FileMaker Cloud 7 addresses checkedChecked
Codeless Platform 7 addresses checkedChecked
Cogniss 7 addresses checkedChecked
CORE Software 7 addresses checkedChecked
Draxlr 7 addresses checkedChecked
DronaHQ 7 addresses checkedChecked
Equals 7 addresses checkedChecked
GoodBarber 7 addresses checkedChecked
Grist 7 addresses checkedChecked
Jet Admin 7 addresses checkedChecked
Jetboost 7 addresses checkedChecked
K-Rise EASYProcess 7 addresses checkedChecked
Kohezion 7 addresses checkedChecked
Marmelab 7 addresses checkedChecked
Mendix 7 addresses checkedChecked
Ninox 7 addresses checkedChecked
NocoDB 7 addresses checkedChecked
Noloco 7 addresses checkedChecked
OrangeKloud 7 addresses checkedChecked
OutSystems 7 addresses checkedChecked
Pory 7 addresses checkedChecked
Quickbase 7 addresses checkedChecked
Refine 7 addresses checkedChecked
Rows 7 addresses checkedChecked
RUAL Core 7 addresses checkedChecked
Stacker 7 addresses checkedChecked
Teable 7 addresses checkedChecked
TeamDesk 7 addresses checkedChecked
ToolJet 7 addresses checkedChecked
UI Bakery 7 addresses checkedChecked
Windmill 7 addresses checkedChecked
Xano 7 addresses checkedChecked
Zingy 7 addresses checkedChecked
Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

VendorWhat we found
Unqork This vendor was not measured because our run stopped waiting for it.Checked

Other criteria in Low-code and internal tools

Subprocessor list in related categories

Found something we missed? Tell us. A correction moves that vendor into our next nightly run. That run reads the same fixed addresses we check for every vendor, not the address you send.