SaaS Ranking

security.txt (RFC 9116) in Document management

It tells a researcher where to report a vulnerability instead of guessing.

2 of 15 vendors we measured here publish it, that is 13%. Last checked 2026-09-03.

13% here against 13% across every category we measure. Document management sits exactly at the overall share for this criterion.

Back to security.txt (RFC 9116) across all categories, or to Document management.

Published

Served at /.well-known/security.txt.

VendorWhat we found
DocuWare https://docuware.com/.well-known/security.txt
ELO https://www.elo.com/.well-known/security.txt

No security.txt found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
Ademero 1 address checked
agorum 1 address checked
Amagno 1 address checked
Bitfarm 1 address checked
Casebox 1 address checked
d.velop 1 address checked
Docbyte 1 address checked
Dokmee 1 address checked
DynaFile 1 address checked
FileHold 1 address checked
M-Files 1 address checked
Mayan EDMS 1 address checked
Worldox 1 address checked

Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

VendorWhat we found
Docsvault The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.
LogicalDOC None of the addresses could be reached, so this was not measured.
OpenText The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.
SER Group None of the addresses could be reached, so this was not measured.

Found something we missed? Tell us and the next run picks it up.