Transparency alternatives to Base
Other Customer reviews and testimonials vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Base. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 31 that differ from Base on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Base has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Base” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Base | Found at Base, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOCisoci.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to SOCi | 65/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Reputationreputation.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Reputation | 43/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Birdeyebirdeye.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Birdeye | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Uberalluberall.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Uberall | 39/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Boastboast.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Boast | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| G2g2.comSee also Transparency alternatives to G2 | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Vocal Videovocalvideo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vocal Video | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Broadlybroadly.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Broadly | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Reviewflowzreviewflowz.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Reviewflowz | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Reviewshakereviewshake.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Reviewshake | 30/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Testimonial Herotestimonialhero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Testimonial Hero | 26/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Podiumpodium.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Podium | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.