Transparency alternatives to OMR Reviews
Other Customer reviews and testimonials vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at OMR Reviews. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 31 that differ from OMR Reviews on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
OMR Reviews has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at OMR Reviews” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at OMR Reviews | Found at OMR Reviews, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOCisoci.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to SOCi | 65/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Reputationreputation.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Reputation | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Birdeyebirdeye.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Birdeye | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Uberalluberall.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Uberall | 39/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Boastboast.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Boast | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| G2g2.comSee also Transparency alternatives to G2 | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Vocal Videovocalvideo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vocal Video | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Broadlybroadly.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Broadly | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Reviewflowzreviewflowz.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Reviewflowz | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Reviewshakereviewshake.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Reviewshake | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Testimonial Herotestimonialhero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Testimonial Hero | 26/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Podiumpodium.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Podium | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.