Transparency alternatives to Anomalo
Other Data catalogs and governance vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Anomalo. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 24 that differ from Anomalo on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Anomalo has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Anomalo” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Anomalo | Found at Anomalo, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metaplanemetaplane.devSee also Transparency alternatives to Metaplane | 48/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Preciselyprecisely.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Precisely | 30/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Privaceraprivacera.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Privacera | 48/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Satorisatoricyber.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Satori | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Immutaimmuta.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Immuta | 39/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Bigeyebigeye.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bigeye | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | Compare |
| Validiovalidio.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Validio | 30/100 | 1 Certifications named | 2 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Datagalaxydatagalaxy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Datagalaxy | 22/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Varonisvaronis.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Varonis | 17/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Acceldataacceldata.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Acceldata | 13/100 | 1 Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Lightuplightup.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Lightup | 35/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Colectica Repositorycolectica.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Colectica Repository | 22/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.