SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Datagalaxy

Other Data catalogs and governance vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Datagalaxy. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 24 that differ from Datagalaxy on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Datagalaxy has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Datagalaxy” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at DatagalaxyFound at Datagalaxy, not found there
Metaplanemetaplane.devSee also Transparency alternatives to Metaplane 48/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 1 Data location stated Compare
Anomaloanomalo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Anomalo 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Certifications named Compare
Privaceraprivacera.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Privacera 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Satorisatoricyber.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Satori 43/100 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent 1 Certifications named Compare
Bigeyebigeye.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bigeye 35/100 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Data location stated Compare
Preciselyprecisely.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Precisely 30/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
Immutaimmuta.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Immuta 39/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Lightuplightup.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Lightup 35/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Validiovalidio.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Validio 30/100 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data location stated Compare
DataHubdatahub.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DataHub 22/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Colectica Repositorycolectica.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Colectica Repository 22/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Varonisvaronis.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Varonis 17/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data location stated Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.