Transparency alternatives to Satori
Other Data catalogs and governance vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Satori. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 24 that differ from Satori on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Satori has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Satori” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Satori | Found at Satori, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metaplanemetaplane.devSee also Transparency alternatives to Metaplane | 61/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Privaceraprivacera.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Privacera | 57/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Anomaloanomalo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Anomalo | 52/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Bigeyebigeye.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bigeye | 48/100 | 2 Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Lightuplightup.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Lightup | 35/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| Preciselyprecisely.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Precisely | 30/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Validiovalidio.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Validio | 30/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| DataHubdatahub.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DataHub | 22/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| Immutaimmuta.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Immuta | 39/100 | 1 Certifications named | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Varonisvaronis.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Varonis | 30/100 | 1 Certifications named | 2 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Acceldataacceldata.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Acceldata | 26/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Datagalaxydatagalaxy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Datagalaxy | 22/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.