SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Keboola

Other Data integration vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Keboola does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 29 that differ from Keboola on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Keboola has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “publishes and Keboola does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Keboola does notKeboola publishes, and they do not
Segmentsegment.com 57/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
Estuaryestuary.dev 80/100 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Prefectprefect.io 80/100 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Striimstriim.com 58/100 2 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named Compare
Weldweld.app 57/100 1 Status page with history 3 security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact Compare
Hevo Datahevodata.com 55/100 1 Status page with history 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Hightouchhightouch.com 55/100 1 Subprocessor list 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Matillionmatillion.com 55/100 1 Status page with history 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Astronomerastronomer.io 52/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Snowplowsnowplow.io 43/100 1 Subprocessor list 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
dbt Labsgetdbt.com 35/100 1 Status page with history 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Riveryrivery.io 35/100 1 Status page with history 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.