Transparency alternatives to Snowplow
Other Data integration vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Snowplow. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 47 that differ from Snowplow on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Snowplow has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Snowplow” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Snowplow | Found at Snowplow, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hevo Datahevodata.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hevo Data | 52/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Weldweld.appSee also Transparency alternatives to Weld | 57/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| MigrationWizbittitan.comSee also Transparency alternatives to MigrationWiz | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Confluentconfluent.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Confluent | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Estuaryestuary.devSee also Transparency alternatives to Estuary | 65/100 | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | nothing | Compare |
| Prefectprefect.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Prefect | 65/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Matillionmatillion.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Matillion | 61/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Astronomerastronomer.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Astronomer | 52/100 | 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Keboolakeboola.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Keboola | 52/100 | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| RudderStackrudderstack.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RudderStack | 48/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Integrate.iointegrate.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Integrate.io | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Striimstriim.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Striim | 41/100 | 3 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.