Transparency alternatives to Redpanda
Other Data integration vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Redpanda. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 47 that differ from Redpanda on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Redpanda has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Redpanda” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Redpanda | Found at Redpanda, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hevo Datahevodata.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hevo Data | 52/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Estuaryestuary.devSee also Transparency alternatives to Estuary | 65/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Prefectprefect.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Prefect | 65/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Matillionmatillion.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Matillion | 61/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Weldweld.appSee also Transparency alternatives to Weld | 57/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Astronomerastronomer.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Astronomer | 52/100 | 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| RudderStackrudderstack.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RudderStack | 48/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Integrate.iointegrate.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Integrate.io | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| MigrationWizbittitan.comSee also Transparency alternatives to MigrationWiz | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Riveryrivery.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Rivery | 43/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Striimstriim.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Striim | 41/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Skyviaskyvia.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Skyvia | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.