Transparency alternatives to Alegion
Other Data labelling vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Alegion. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 38 that differ from Alegion on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Alegion has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Alegion” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Alegion | Found at Alegion, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scale AIscale.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scale AI | 52/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| SuperAnnotatesuperannotate.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SuperAnnotate | 57/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| HumanSignalhumansignal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to HumanSignal | 43/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| V7v7labs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to V7 | 43/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Datasaurdatasaur.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Datasaur | 30/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Hivethehive.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Hive | 43/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| CVATcvat.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to CVAT | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Kilikili-technology.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kili | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Labelboxlabelbox.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Labelbox | 22/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Roboflowroboflow.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Roboflow | 22/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Tolokatoloka.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Toloka | 22/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Encordencord.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Encord | 26/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.