Transparency alternatives to PlanetScale
Other Data warehouses and databases vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at PlanetScale. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 41 that differ from PlanetScale on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
PlanetScale has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at PlanetScale” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at PlanetScale | Found at PlanetScale, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Snowflakesnowflake.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Snowflake | 65/100 | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | 3 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Dremiodremio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dremio | 57/100 | 6 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 | 4 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Supabasesupabase.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Supabase | 70/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Convexconvex.devSee also Transparency alternatives to Convex | 35/100 | 5 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Aivenaiven.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Aiven | 78/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| SurrealDBsurrealdb.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SurrealDB | 65/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Neonneon.techSee also Transparency alternatives to Neon | 61/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Prismaprisma.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Prisma | 61/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Tiger Datatigerdata.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tiger Data | 61/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| InfluxDatainfluxdata.comSee also Transparency alternatives to InfluxData | 57/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Redisredis.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Redis | 52/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Tinybirdtinybird.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Tinybird | 52/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 3 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.