Alternatives to Databricks
Other Data warehouses and databases vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Databricks does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 26 that differ from Databricks on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Databricks has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “publishes and Databricks does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Databricks does not | Databricks publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Timescaletimescale.com | 74/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Aivenaiven.io | 78/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| InfluxDatainfluxdata.com | 57/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Neonneon.tech | 52/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Snowflakesnowflake.com | 52/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Dragonflydragonflydb.io | 35/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
| ScyllaDBscylladb.com | 52/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| CockroachDBcockroachlabs.com | 39/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| SingleStoresinglestore.com | 39/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Xataxata.io | 39/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| ClickHouseclickhouse.com | 35/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Materializematerialize.com | 35/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.