Transparency alternatives to MongoDB Atlas
Other Data warehouses and databases vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that MongoDB Atlas does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 41 that differ from MongoDB Atlas on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
MongoDB Atlas has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “publishes and MongoDB Atlas does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and MongoDB Atlas does not | MongoDB Atlas publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aivenaiven.io | 78/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| Supabasesupabase.com | 78/100 | 3 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Tiger Datatigerdata.com | 61/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Weaviateweaviate.io | 61/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Neonneon.tech | 52/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history | Compare |
| SurrealDBsurrealdb.com | 65/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Databricksdatabricks.com | 57/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | Compare |
| Redisredis.io | 52/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history | Compare |
| PlanetScaleplanetscale.com | 43/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Prismaprisma.io | 39/100 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| SingleStoresinglestore.com | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| DoubleClouddouble.cloud | 35/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.