Transparency alternatives to The Cinema Designer
Other Design and prototyping vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at The Cinema Designer. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 30 that differ from The Cinema Designer on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
The Cinema Designer has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at The Cinema Designer” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at The Cinema Designer | Found at The Cinema Designer, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recraftrecraft.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Recraft | 61/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Photoroomphotoroom.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Photoroom | 48/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Splinespline.designSee also Transparency alternatives to Spline | 43/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| PicMonkeypicmonkey.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PicMonkey | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| UXPinuxpin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to UXPin | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Pencilpencil.devSee also Transparency alternatives to Pencil | 35/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Erasereraser.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Eraser | 30/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Supernovasupernova.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Supernova | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Infograminfogram.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Infogram | 22/100 | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Specifyspecifyapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Specify | 22/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Knapsackknapsack.cloudSee also Transparency alternatives to Knapsack | 17/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| ZeroLightzerolight.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ZeroLight | 17/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.