Transparency alternatives to Air
Other Digital asset management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Air. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 36 that differ from Air on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Air has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Air” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Air | Found at Air, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cloudinarycloudinary.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cloudinary | 64/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Frontifyfrontify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Frontify | 61/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Sitecore Content Hubsitecore.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sitecore Content Hub | 35/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Imgiximgix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Imgix | 43/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Massetgetmasset.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Masset | 43/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact | 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Aprimoaprimo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aprimo | 30/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Censharecenshare.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Censhare | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Pic-Timepic-time.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pic-Time | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Pimcorepimcore.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pimcore | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Wediawedia-group.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Wedia | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Brandfolderbrandfolder.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Brandfolder | 39/100 | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Bynderbynder.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bynder | 39/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.