Transparency alternatives to Sitecore Content Hub
Other Digital asset management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Sitecore Content Hub. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 36 that differ from Sitecore Content Hub on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Sitecore Content Hub has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Sitecore Content Hub” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Sitecore Content Hub | Found at Sitecore Content Hub, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cloudinarycloudinary.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cloudinary | 64/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Bynderbynder.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bynder | 39/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Airair.incSee also Transparency alternatives to Air | 36/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Uploadcareuploadcare.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Uploadcare | 30/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Frontifyfrontify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Frontify | 61/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Massetgetmasset.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Masset | 43/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Brandfolderbrandfolder.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Brandfolder | 39/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| ResourceSpaceresourcespace.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ResourceSpace | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Scaleflexscaleflex.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scaleflex | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Filecampfilecamp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Filecamp | 23/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Imgiximgix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Imgix | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Censharecenshare.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Censhare | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.