Transparency alternatives to Pimcore
Other Digital asset management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Pimcore. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 35 that differ from Pimcore on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Pimcore has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Pimcore” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Pimcore | Found at Pimcore, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cloudinarycloudinary.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cloudinary | 64/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Frontifyfrontify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Frontify | 61/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Brandfolderbrandfolder.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Brandfolder | 39/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Bynderbynder.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bynder | 39/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Airair.incSee also Transparency alternatives to Air | 36/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Uploadcareuploadcare.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Uploadcare | 30/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Imgiximgix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Imgix | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Massetgetmasset.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Masset | 43/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Aprimoaprimo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aprimo | 30/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Scaleflexscaleflex.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scaleflex | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Filecampfilecamp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Filecamp | 23/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| ResourceSpaceresourcespace.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ResourceSpace | 35/100 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.