Alternatives to Cloudinary
Other Digital asset management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Cloudinary does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 24 that differ from Cloudinary on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Cloudinary has 3 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “publishes and Cloudinary does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Cloudinary does not | Cloudinary publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frontifyfrontify.com | 61/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Imgiximgix.com | 43/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Sitecore Content Hubsitecore.com | 25/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
| Airair.inc | 36/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | Compare |
| Brandfolderbrandfolder.com | 35/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| ResourceSpaceresourcespace.com | 35/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Cantocanto.com | 30/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Censharecenshare.com | 30/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Fotowarefotoware.com | 30/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| MediaValetmediavalet.com | 30/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Acquia DAMacquia.com | 25/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Pimcorepimcore.com | 25/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.