Transparency alternatives to Display5
Other Digital signage vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Display5. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 48 that differ from Display5 on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Display5 has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “Found there, not found at Display5” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Display5 | Found at Display5, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appspaceappspace.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Appspace | 52/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Yodeckyodeck.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Yodeck | 65/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Rocket Alumnirocketalumnisolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rocket Alumni | 48/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| ScreenCloudscreencloud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ScreenCloud | 48/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Poppulopoppulo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Poppulo | 48/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Navorinavori.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Navori | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Onsignonsign.tvSee also Transparency alternatives to Onsign | 30/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Xiboxibo.org.ukSee also Transparency alternatives to Xibo | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Carouselcarouselsignage.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Carousel | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| NoviSignnovisign.comSee also Transparency alternatives to NoviSign | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Disedise.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dise | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| OptiSignsoptisigns.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OptiSigns | 26/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.