Transparency alternatives to Xibo
Other Digital signage vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Xibo does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 53 that differ from Xibo on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Xibo has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Xibo does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Xibo does not | Xibo publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appspaceappspace.com | 52/100 | 5 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Yodeckyodeck.com | 65/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Poppulopoppulo.com | 48/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| ScreenCloudscreencloud.com | 48/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Navorinavori.com | 39/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Onsignonsign.tv | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Revel Digitalreveldigital.com | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Screenlyscreenly.io | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Rocket Alumnirocketalumnisolutions.com | 48/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Broadsignbroadsign.com | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| NoviSignnovisign.com | 35/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| OptiSignsoptisigns.com | 26/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.