Transparency alternatives to Yodeck
Other Digital signage vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Yodeck. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 53 that differ from Yodeck on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Yodeck has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Yodeck” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Yodeck | Found at Yodeck, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ScreenCloudscreencloud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ScreenCloud | 57/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Appspaceappspace.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Appspace | 52/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Netpresenternetpresenter.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Netpresenter | 13/100 | 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 7 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 | Compare |
| Rocket Alumnirocketalumnisolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rocket Alumni | 48/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Xiboxibo.org.ukSee also Transparency alternatives to Xibo | 48/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Play Digital Signageplaysignage.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Play Digital Signage | 43/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| OptiSignsoptisigns.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OptiSigns | 39/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Wallboardwallboard.infoSee also Transparency alternatives to Wallboard | 39/100 | 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Onsignonsign.tvSee also Transparency alternatives to Onsign | 35/100 | 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Disedise.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dise | 30/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Screenlyscreenly.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Screenly | 26/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| Grassfishgrassfish.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Grassfish | 17/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.