Transparency alternatives to Scandit
Other Document AI and data capture vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Scandit. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 37 that differ from Scandit on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Scandit has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Scandit” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Scandit | Found at Scandit, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypatoshypatos.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Hypatos | 65/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Parseurparseur.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Parseur | 65/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Formxformx.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Formx | 57/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Affindaaffinda.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Affinda | 63/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Mindeemindee.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mindee | 57/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Nanonetsnanonets.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nanonets | 57/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Docsumodocsumo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Docsumo | 52/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Veryfiveryfi.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Veryfi | 48/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Bdo Digitalocrolus.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bdo Digital | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Abbyyabbyy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Abbyy | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Deepsetdeepset.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Deepset | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | nothing | Compare |
| Sensiblesensible.soSee also Transparency alternatives to Sensible | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.