Transparency alternatives to Hypatos
Other Document AI and data capture vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Hypatos. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 39 that differ from Hypatos on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Hypatos has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Hypatos” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Hypatos | Found at Hypatos, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Formxformx.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Formx | 57/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Docsumodocsumo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Docsumo | 52/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Affindaaffinda.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Affinda | 50/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Instabaseinstabase.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Instabase | 30/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
| Parseurparseur.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Parseur | 65/100 | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Nanonetsnanonets.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nanonets | 48/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Veryfiveryfi.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Veryfi | 48/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Anyrowanyrow.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Anyrow | 26/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
| Vintasoftvintasoft.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vintasoft | 9/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 8 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +5 | Compare |
| Mindeemindee.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mindee | 57/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Abbyyabbyy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Abbyy | 39/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Bdo Digitalocrolus.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bdo Digital | 39/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.