SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to IcePanel

Other Document collaboration vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that IcePanel does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 36 that differ from IcePanel on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

IcePanel has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and IcePanel does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and IcePanel does notIcePanel publishes, and they do not
FigJamfigma.com 87/100 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 nothing Compare
Preziprezi.com 73/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 nothing Compare
Createlycreately.com 70/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 nothing Compare
Pitchpitch.com 61/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 nothing Compare
Conceptboardconceptboard.com 52/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 1 Public pricing Compare
Stormboardstormboard.com 52/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
MindMeistermindmeister.com 43/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 nothing Compare
Lucidchartlucid.co 43/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named nothing Compare
Muralmural.co 43/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named nothing Compare
Beautiful.aibeautiful.ai 39/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Cacoonulab.com 35/100 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Klaxoonklaxoon.com 30/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.