SaaS Ranking
Menu

FigJam: what they publish

figma.com · Document collaboration · checked 2026-10-15

87/100ABand A

Rank 1 of 37 in Document collaboration, where the median is 26.

Public transparency score, not a product or security rating. Latest check: 2026-10-15. How the score works.

Evidence at a glance

Choose a check to see its source, date and scope.

Not found means not found at the addresses we checked. Not measured means we could not complete the check.

Start a vendor reviewDownload evidence (CSV)

Overview

4 days since the newest dated result, 4 since the oldest. 12 of 12 criteria have a measured result in the last 30 days. Failed checks and undated results are excluded.

Evidence freshness is a statement about our measurement and is kept apart from the transparency score, which is frozen at v1. How good our own measurement is.

Transparency labelsaas-ranking.com

FigJam

figma.com · Document collaboration

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
A 87of 100 Rank 1 of 37

Published commitments8 of 9 found

Measured behaviour2 of 3 found

Checked 2026-10-15. Every line links the page we found it on. A cross means we found nothing at the addresses we checked, not that the vendor has no such document. A transparency score, not a product rating.

Downloads include all checks, source URLs, dates and the snapshot ID for your procurement file. We do not issue badges.

The label is the whole measurement in one object: every criterion with its weight, the band, and the date. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Every line in it links the page we found the result on, or lists the addresses we checked. A cross means we found nothing there, not that FigJam has no such document.

Where FigJam sits in Document collaboration

  1. A1 3%
  2. B2 5%
  3. C1 3%
  4. D6 16%
  5. E9 24%
  6. F18 49%
37 vendors with a score; 4 more without a score because we could measure too little. Bands have fixed thresholds, see how the score works.

The band of FigJam is marked. Vendors without a score are the ones where we could measure too few criteria to rank them – a gap on our side, counted separately.

What FigJam states

The exact figures and names we read off the pages linked below, with the sentence they stand in. This is what they publish, not what we verified about their systems.

Gaps, heaviest first

✗weight 2 of 3

Third-party requests seen on the first load, before any interaction.

Checked 1 address on 2026-10-15.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://figma.com/ – third-party requests before any interaction: arclight.vimeo.com, cdn.sanity.io, f.vimeocdn.com, featureassets.org, i.vimeocdn.com, player.vimeo.com, prodregistryv2.org, vimeo.com, vod-adaptive-ak.vimeocdn.com

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: No third-party tracking before consent in Document collaboration: 6 of 41 companies

✗

Uptime SLA with a figure

weight 1 of 3

No uptime figure found.

Checked 6 addresses on 2026-10-15.

Show the 6 addresses we checked
  1. https://figma.com/legal/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://figma.com/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://figma.com/legal/service-level-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://figma.com/trust/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://figma.com/uptime – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://figma.com/legal/uptime-sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Uptime SLA with a figure in Document collaboration: 0 of 37 companies

Evidence

The full source lists sit behind these two groups, so that the answer above stays readable.

Published, with a source 10
✓

Data processing agreement (DPA)

weight 3 of 3

Published and readable without a login.

Source: https://www.figma.com/legal/dpa/ · checked 2026-10-15

Across the market: Data processing agreement in Document collaboration: 6 of 37 companies

✓

Subprocessors: the published list

weight 3 of 3

The actual list is published, not just a promise to keep one.

Source: https://www.figma.com/sub-processors/ · checked 2026-10-15

Across the market: Subprocessor list in Document collaboration: 4 of 37 companies

✓

Data location: where they say data is hosted

weight 3 of 3

The hosting location is stated on a public page.

  • Locations named next to the hosting wording United States. This does not establish the company’s headquarters.
    Show the exact wording

    Specifically, all personal information we process is transferred to, processed and stored in the United States, where our headquarters and our main servers are located.

    Read at https://www.figma.com/legal/privacy/

Source: https://www.figma.com/legal/privacy/ · checked 2026-10-15

Across the market: Data location stated in Document collaboration: 15 of 37 companies

✓

Status page with incident history

weight 2 of 3

A public status page with incident history.

Source: https://status.figma.com/ · checked 2026-10-15

Across the market: Status page with history in Document collaboration: 7 of 40 companies

✓

Public pricing with figures

weight 2 of 3

Actual numbers on a public page.

Source: https://www.figma.com/pricing/ · checked 2026-10-15

Across the market: Public pricing in Document collaboration: 26 of 37 companies

✓

HTTPS enforced with HSTS

weight 2 of 3

HTTP redirects to HTTPS and the HSTS header is set.

  • HSTS max-age 31536000 seconds (365 days).
    Show the exact wording

    max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Read at https://figma.com/
  • HSTS options includeSubDomains, preload.
    Show the 2 exact wordings

    max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Read at https://figma.com/

    max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Read at https://figma.com/

Source: https://figma.com/ · checked 2026-10-15

Across the market: HTTPS enforced with HSTS in Document collaboration: 30 of 40 companies

✓

Notice before subprocessors change

weight 2 of 3

The vendor commits publicly to giving notice before the list changes.

Source: https://www.figma.com/sub-processors/ · checked 2026-10-15

Across the market: Notice before subprocessors change in Document collaboration: 4 of 37 companies

✓

Certifications named (SOC 2, ISO 27001)

weight 1 of 3

SOC 2 or ISO 27001 named on a public page.

  • Named on that page FedRAMP (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), ISO/IEC 27001 (named without a certification claim), ISO/IEC 27017 (named without a certification claim), ISO/IEC 27018 (named without a certification claim), ISO/IEC 27701 (named without a certification claim), SOC 2 Type II, TISAX (unclear from the sentence). The sentence we kept does not carry this finding on its own, so it counts in no list and no figure.
    Show the 7 exact wordings

    Learn more FedRAMP Authorized FedRAMP (Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program) is a U.S.

    Read at https://www.figma.com/security/

    Learn more ISO 27001+ ISO 27017 ISO 27018 ISO 27701 Figma has certified its product and services against ISO/IEC 27001:2

    Read at https://www.figma.com/security/

    Learn more ISO 27001+ ISO 27017 ISO 27018 ISO 27701 Figma has certified its product and services against ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and ISO

    Read at https://www.figma.com/security/

    Learn more ISO 27001+ ISO 27017 ISO 27018 ISO 27701 Figma has certified its product and services against ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and ISO/IEC 27018

    Read at https://www.figma.com/security/

    Learn more ISO 27001+ ISO 27017 ISO 27018 ISO 27701 Figma has certified its product and services against ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and ISO/IEC 27018:2019.

    Read at https://www.figma.com/security/

    SOC 2 Figma has an SOC 2 Type 2 report that shows our commitment to protecting customer data through robu

    Read at https://www.figma.com/security/

    Learn more TISAX Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange (TISAX) is a European automotive industry-standard

    Read at https://www.figma.com/security/

Source: https://www.figma.com/security/ · checked 2026-10-15

Across the market: Certifications named in Document collaboration: 18 of 40 companies

✓

security.txt (RFC 9116)

weight 1 of 3

Served at /.well-known/security.txt.

Source: https://www.figma.com/.well-known/security.txt · checked 2026-10-15

Across the market: security.txt (RFC 9116) in Document collaboration: 7 of 39 companies

✓

Named privacy contact (DPO or privacy address)

weight 1 of 3

A data protection officer or a dedicated privacy address is named.

Source: https://www.figma.com/legal/privacy/ · checked 2026-10-15

Across the market: Named privacy contact in Document collaboration: 12 of 37 companies

History

100 0 2026-10-08: 87 of 1002026-10-15: 87 of 100 2026-10-08 2026-10-15
Score over the last 2 runs we measured FigJam in: 87 (2026-10-08), 87 (2026-10-15).

Prepare your vendor review

A source is a starting point. Check the product, plan, legal entity and date before treating it as evidence for your purchase. These questions do not change the transparency score.

FigJam

10 found · 2 not found · 0 not measured across 12 public checks.

12 of 12 criteria have a measured result from the last 30 days. Oldest dated result: 2026-10-15.

Investigate 2 open evidence questions
  1. Uptime SLA with a figure

    Which availability commitment applies to our plan? Please include the measurement window, exclusions and credit claim process.

    Inspect this check
  2. No third-party tracking before consent

    Which third-party requests occur before a visitor makes a choice, and for what purpose? Please distinguish the public website from the product.

    Inspect this check

Compare

A shortlist holds up to six vendors across categories and lives entirely in the address of its page: share the link, bookmark it, put it in a ticket. Nothing is stored, so we do not know it exists.