SaaS Ranking
Menu

Conceptboard: what they publish

conceptboard.com · Document collaboration · checked 2026-10-17

52/100DBand D

Rank 5 of 37 in Document collaboration, where the median is 26.

Public transparency score, not a product or security rating. Latest check: 2026-10-17. How the score works.

Evidence at a glance

Choose a check to see its source, date and scope.

Not found means not found at the addresses we checked. Not measured means we could not complete the check.

Start a vendor reviewDownload evidence (CSV)

Overview

0 days since the newest dated result, 0 since the oldest. 12 of 12 criteria have a measured result in the last 30 days. Failed checks and undated results are excluded.

Evidence freshness is a statement about our measurement and is kept apart from the transparency score, which is frozen at v1. How good our own measurement is.

Transparency labelsaas-ranking.com

Conceptboard

conceptboard.com · Document collaboration

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
D 52of 100 Rank 5 of 37

Published commitments4 of 9 found

Measured behaviour2 of 3 found

Checked 2026-10-17. Every line links the page we found it on. A cross means we found nothing at the addresses we checked, not that the vendor has no such document. A transparency score, not a product rating.

Downloads include all checks, source URLs, dates and the snapshot ID for your procurement file. We do not issue badges.

The label is the whole measurement in one object: every criterion with its weight, the band, and the date. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Every line in it links the page we found the result on, or lists the addresses we checked. A cross means we found nothing there, not that Conceptboard has no such document.

Where Conceptboard sits in Document collaboration

  1. A1 3%
  2. B2 5%
  3. C1 3%
  4. D6 16%
  5. E9 24%
  6. F18 49%
37 vendors with a score; 4 more without a score because we could measure too little. Bands have fixed thresholds, see how the score works.

The band of Conceptboard is marked. Vendors without a score are the ones where we could measure too few criteria to rank them – a gap on our side, counted separately.

What Conceptboard states

The exact figures and names we read off the pages linked below, with the sentence they stand in. This is what they publish, not what we verified about their systems.

Gaps, heaviest first

✗

Subprocessors: the published list

weight 3 of 3

No subprocessor list found.

Checked 7 addresses on 2026-10-17.

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://conceptboard.com/legal/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://conceptboard.com/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://conceptboard.com/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://conceptboard.com/legal/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://conceptboard.com/trust/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://conceptboard.com/privacy/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://conceptboard.com/legal/subprocessor-list – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Subprocessor list in Document collaboration: 4 of 37 companies

✗

Status page with incident history

weight 2 of 3

No public status page found.

Checked 3 addresses on 2026-10-17.

Show the 3 addresses we checked
  1. https://status.conceptboard.com/ – Could not be fetched: fetch failed.
  2. https://conceptboard.com/status – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://conceptboard.com.statuspage.io/ – Could not be fetched: fetch failed.

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Status page with history in Document collaboration: 7 of 40 companies

✗

Public pricing with figures

weight 2 of 3

No public pricing with figures found.

Checked 5 addresses on 2026-10-17.

Show the 5 addresses we checked
  1. https://conceptboard.com/pricing – reached and rendered, no match
  2. https://conceptboard.com/pricing/ – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://conceptboard.com/plans – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  4. https://conceptboard.com/en/pricing – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  5. https://conceptboard.com/pricing-plans – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Public pricing in Document collaboration: 26 of 37 companies

✗

Notice before subprocessors change

weight 2 of 3

No commitment to give notice before subprocessors change found.

Checked 8 addresses on 2026-10-17.

Show the 8 addresses we checked
  1. https://conceptboard.com/legal/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://conceptboard.com/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://conceptboard.com/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://conceptboard.com/legal/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://conceptboard.com/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  6. https://conceptboard.com/legal/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://conceptboard.com/trust/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  8. https://conceptboard.com/legal/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Notice before subprocessors change in Document collaboration: 4 of 37 companies

✗

Uptime SLA with a figure

weight 1 of 3

No uptime figure found.

Checked 6 addresses on 2026-10-17.

Show the 6 addresses we checked
  1. https://conceptboard.com/legal/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://conceptboard.com/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://conceptboard.com/legal/service-level-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://conceptboard.com/trust/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://conceptboard.com/uptime – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://conceptboard.com/legal/uptime-sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Uptime SLA with a figure in Document collaboration: 0 of 37 companies

✗

security.txt (RFC 9116)

weight 1 of 3

No security.txt found.

Checked 1 address on 2026-10-17.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://conceptboard.com/.well-known/security.txt – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: security.txt (RFC 9116) in Document collaboration: 7 of 39 companies

Evidence

The full source lists sit behind these two groups, so that the answer above stays readable.

Published, with a source 6
✓

Data processing agreement (DPA)

weight 3 of 3

Published and readable without a login.

Source: https://conceptboard.com/data-processing-agreement/ · checked 2026-10-17

Across the market: Data processing agreement in Document collaboration: 6 of 37 companies

✓

Data location: where they say data is hosted

weight 3 of 3

The hosting location is stated on a public page.

  • Locations named next to the hosting wording Germany. This does not establish the company’s headquarters.
    Show the exact wording

    GDPR-compliant, hosted in Germany, and certified: this makes collaboration a safe space for your ideas.

    Read at https://conceptboard.com/data-security/

Source: https://conceptboard.com/data-security/ · checked 2026-10-17

Across the market: Data location stated in Document collaboration: 14 of 37 companies

✓

HTTPS enforced with HSTS

weight 2 of 3

HTTP redirects to HTTPS and the HSTS header is set.

Source: https://conceptboard.com/ · checked 2026-10-17

Across the market: HTTPS enforced with HSTS in Document collaboration: 30 of 40 companies

✓weight 2 of 3

No third-party requests before any interaction.

Source: https://conceptboard.com/ · checked 2026-10-17

Across the market: No third-party tracking before consent in Document collaboration: 6 of 41 companies

✓

Certifications named (SOC 2, ISO 27001)

weight 1 of 3

SOC 2 or ISO 27001 named on a public page.

  • Named on that page ISO/IEC 27001 (unclear from the sentence), ISO/IEC 27017 (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), ISO/IEC 27018 (not counted: the sentence does not carry it). The sentence we kept does not carry this finding on its own, so it counts in no list and no figure.
    Show the 3 exact wordings

    Certification according to ISO 27001 ensures a structured information security management system that minimizes risks and establishes cl

    Read at https://conceptboard.com/data-security/

    Additionally, ISO 27017 guarantees secure cloud usage, while ISO 27018 focuses on the protection of personal data.

    Read at https://conceptboard.com/data-security/

    Additionally, ISO 27017 guarantees secure cloud usage, while ISO 27018 focuses on the protection of personal data.

    Read at https://conceptboard.com/data-security/

Source: https://conceptboard.com/data-security/ · checked 2026-10-17

Across the market: Certifications named in Document collaboration: 18 of 40 companies

✓

Named privacy contact (DPO or privacy address)

weight 1 of 3

A data protection officer or a dedicated privacy address is named.

Source: https://conceptboard.com/privacy-policy/ · checked 2026-10-17

Across the market: Named privacy contact in Document collaboration: 12 of 37 companies

History

100 0 2026-10-10: 52 of 1002026-10-17: 52 of 100 2026-10-10 2026-10-17
Score over the last 2 runs we measured Conceptboard in: 52 (2026-10-10), 52 (2026-10-17).

Prepare your vendor review

A source is a starting point. Check the product, plan, legal entity and date before treating it as evidence for your purchase. These questions do not change the transparency score.

Conceptboard

6 found · 6 not found · 0 not measured across 12 public checks.

12 of 12 criteria have a measured result from the last 30 days. Oldest dated result: 2026-10-17.

Investigate 6 open evidence questions
  1. Subprocessor list

    Which subprocessors apply to our product, what does each process, and in which countries? Please share the current list.

    Inspect this check
  2. Status page with history

    Where can we review incident history for the service we will use, and how do we subscribe to incident updates?

    Inspect this check
  3. Public pricing

    Please confirm the total cost for our seats and usage, including minimum commitments, add-ons, overages and renewal terms.

    Inspect this check
  4. Uptime SLA with a figure

    Which availability commitment applies to our plan? Please include the measurement window, exclusions and credit claim process.

    Inspect this check
  5. security.txt (RFC 9116)

    Where should we report a vulnerability, and what acknowledgement and follow-up process should we expect?

    Inspect this check
  6. Notice before subprocessors change

    How will you notify us before a subprocessor changes, with how much notice, and what response options apply to our contract?

    Inspect this check

Compare

A shortlist holds up to six vendors across categories and lives entirely in the address of its page: share the link, bookmark it, put it in a ticket. Nothing is stored, so we do not know it exists.