SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Unifly

Other Drone operations vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Unifly. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 31 that differ from Unifly on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Unifly has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Unifly” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at UniflyFound at Unifly, not found there
DroneDeploydronedeploy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DroneDeploy 65/100 7 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Propeller Aeropropelleraero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Propeller Aero 43/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Airdataairdata.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Airdata 39/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Aeroboticsaerobotics.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aerobotics 35/100 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Flyabilityflyability.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Flyability 35/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Aloftaloft.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Aloft 26/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Dronedeskdronedesk.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Dronedesk 26/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Raptor Mapsraptormaps.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Raptor Maps 26/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Pix4Dpix4d.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pix4D 22/100 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Firmatekfirmatek.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Firmatek 26/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing nothing Compare
Perceptopercepto.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Percepto 26/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Wingtrawingtra.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Wingtra 22/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.