SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to FP Sign

Other E-signature vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that FP Sign does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 21 that differ from FP Sign on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

FP Sign has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and FP Sign does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and FP Sign does notFP Sign publishes, and they do not
BoldSignboldsign.com 83/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 nothing Compare
eversigneversign.com 65/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 2 Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
GetAcceptgetaccept.com 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 1 Status page with history Compare
Sign.comsign.com 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 2 Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
Yousignyousign.com 45/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Skribbleskribble.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 2 Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
Penneopenneo.com 52/100 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
SignEasysigneasy.com 52/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Dropbox Signdropbox.com 50/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing nothing Compare
DocuSigndocusign.com 45/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 1 Certifications named Compare
Signaturitsignaturit.com 40/100 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent 1 Certifications named Compare
Scrivescrive.com 39/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.