Transparency alternatives to Lighthouse
Other eDiscovery and archiving vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Lighthouse. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 37 that differ from Lighthouse on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Lighthouse has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Lighthouse” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Lighthouse | Found at Lighthouse, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DISCOcsdisco.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DISCO | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Hanzohanzo.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Hanzo | 39/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Shieldshieldfc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Shield | 35/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Everlaweverlaw.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Everlaw | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Jatheonjatheon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Jatheon | 45/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Magnet Forensicsmagnetforensics.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Magnet Forensics | 39/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Smarshsmarsh.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Smarsh | 39/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Logikculllogikcull.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Logikcull | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Nuixnuix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nuix | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Behavoxbehavox.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Behavox | 22/100 | 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Mailbutlermailbutler.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Mailbutler | 43/100 | 1 Status page with history | nothing | Compare |
| KLDiscoverykldiscovery.comSee also Transparency alternatives to KLDiscovery | 30/100 | 1 Certifications named | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.