SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to DISCO

Other eDiscovery and archiving vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that DISCO does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 30 that differ from DISCO on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

DISCO has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and DISCO does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and DISCO does notDISCO publishes, and they do not
Everlaweverlaw.com 43/100 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Mailbutlermailbutler.io 43/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Nuixnuix.com 26/100 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 Compare
Hanzohanzo.co 39/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
ArcTitanarctitan.com 35/100 1 Public pricing 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 Compare
CloudNinecloudnine.com 35/100 1 Public pricing 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare
Consilioconsilio.com 35/100 1 Status page with history 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 Compare
GoldFynchgoldfynch.com 35/100 1 Public pricing 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Lighthouselighthouseglobal.com 35/100 1 Public pricing 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Logikculllogikcull.com 30/100 1 Status page with history 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
ComplyKEYwaterfordtechnologies.com 26/100 1 Public pricing 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 Compare
Digital WarRoomdigitalwarroom.com 24/100 1 Public pricing 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.